.

Transparency, Purpose… and why should I care?

Anyone familiar with the TV show Bluey may be familiar with the adorable/annoying sockpuppet, Unicorse. It appears in a few episodes, mostly when Bluey’s dad, Bandit, is feeling … cheeky. Per the image you see, Unicorse has an adorable/annoying habit when people ask them to do (or not to do)… well, anything. When Unicorse is about to ‘spoil’ a book during storytime, they’re asked not to give away the ending. “Aaaand… why should I care?” (“Because you’ll ruin the story…” “Aaand… why should I care?”) And so on, and so forth… 

Ok, Adam, and … why should I care? When it comes to writing course descriptions, learning outcomes, and/or assignments, a lot has been written about SMART goals, observable outcomes, and alignment between these course elements. Yet, we can sometimes take for granted that the deeper purpose(s) of our course(s) are obvious or even visible to students. 

The idea of ‘transparency’ in assignment design (Winkelmes et al., 2016) focuses on the benefits of making clear the purpose, task, and criteria for assessment of a given assignment. Their research suggests that transparency can especially benefit students without knowledge of the ‘unwritten rules’ of higher education. In addition, transparency affords instructors a chance to reflect on the ‘value added’ of a given assignment: what is it that students will take away that helps them later in the course, in their major, in their career, and even in their lives as citizens. 

I say all of this not to suggest that most courses DON’T have a clear purpose, but only that this deeper meaning and purpose can sometimes go unexpressed. In my experience working with instructors across disciplines, engaging this idea of ‘purpose’ through conversation, in plain language, usually brings out what’s already there: why a given course matters in the grand scheme of things. Reflecting on purpose is an opportunity to drill down to what you value as an instructor, and to remember that you have goals for your students that don’t always show up on the syllabus. While it is often used to suss out ‘problems,’ something like Asking the Five Why’s is another way to consider the core purpose(s) of an assignment, a course, etc. To learn more about transparency, visit the Transparency in Learning and Teaching (TILT) website for example assignments (in before/after versions) and more. As always, if you’d like to talk more, reach out to me at asmith@pcad.edu to set up a virtual or in-person meeting.

Previous Posts

End of Semester Reflections: What’s in a grade?

We’ve arrived at the end of the fall semester, and students have turned in their final projects. You may be finishing up grades this week, and everyone deserves a well-earned…

The Role of Reflection in Creativity and Learning

In previous posts, I’ve discussed the creative process at different stages: the benefits of limits and the argument for valuing quantity over ‘quality’ in the initial, divergent-thinking stages, and the…

Gratitude for Teachers (and Learners)

In honor of Thanksgiving, this week’s column emphasizes the role of relationships in our paths through higher education. I’m grateful for the many people I’ve met and worked with, and…

Critique Benefits the One Giving Critique, Too

In a previous post, I shared the idea (not my own) that peer observation is just as useful for the one doing the observation. It can allow us to get…

Faculty Spotlight – Eric Weeks On the Vulnerabilities of Critique

Talking to Eric Weeks, Associate Professor and Chair of Photography & Video at PCA&D, you get the sense of someone whose ideas about art and teaching have evolved slowly, but…

CT&L Faculty Spotlight: Natasha Warshawsky

As we move the CT&L Corner from the weekly newsletter to a blog hosted on the CT&L webpage, I wanted to start with a new, monthly series of Faculty Teaching…